|
|
City and School Board Governance Reform
|
Saturday, 20 February 2010 00:11 |
|
by Moira MacDonald, The Toronto Sun
For as long as I can remember covering the education beat there have been calls for an ombudsman to keep an eye on schools.
The idea has gone nowhere.
Ontario Ombudsman Andre Marin has been clear he sees his role as the public’s watchdog on government, pushing it, shaming it if necessary, to follow the rules and standards it has set for itself and to be accountable for the delivery of taxpayer-funded services.
But not everything is covered. Ontario’s education ministry falls under Marin’s mandate. But where the rubber really hits the road in the school system — schools and the boards that run them — is off-limits to him. Marin can’t touch them — unless they get taken over provincially, like the Toronto Catholic school board.
Toronto District School Board trustee Josh Matlow has stood up on his soapbox occasionally over the last year to call for Marin’s powers to be extended — and to condemn what Matlow says is a proposal by new board director Chris Spence to create a board ombudsman that would report to Spence.
More substantial is a recommendation expected to come to TDSB trustees in March from its special education advisory committee, initiated by a parent who sits on it. It calls for the board to set up an ombudsman who would be “fully independent, impartial” and “confidential,” in helping parents, staff, students and community members resolve conflicts and complaints with the board.
Christina Buczek, a mother of two special needs students in the TDSB who initiated the motions, says she started out proposing an ombudsman for cases involving special needs students, but was persuaded to extend her motion to include all board programs.
‘Squeaky wheel’
“There’s no accountability,” Buczek told me. “The squeaky wheel gets the grease ... but it shouldn’t be that way — there should be a process open for all people.”
Buczek, a one-time trustee candidate and former chair of the committee, has had her own tussles as she advocated for services for her children over the years.
Her story is one I have heard repeatedly from special needs parents, including the time she says she was banned from her daughter’s school over a misheard conversation, under a terrible piece of education legislation allowing anyone, including parents, to be issued a trespass notice without due process or appeal. Buczek could not even escort her daughter to the school door.
If that’s not the sort of thing Marin could get his hands into, I don’t know what would be.
Predictably, things aren’t sounding good from the trustee side.
Trustees’ job
Trustee James Pasternak, vice-chair of the special education committee, doubts Buczek’s motion will pass next month. Trustees — already worried about becoming an endangered species — feel advocacy on behalf of constituents is their job and an ombudsman “could undermine our current policy of shared solutions.” Besides, Pasternak believes the ultimate problem in special education isn’t staff not following the rules, it’s — wait for it — underfunding.
“What we have in place is not perfect, but I think it’s pretty good,” Pasternak told me.
But not good enough. An ombudsman would be there to advocate in the most extreme cases and identify systemic problems — and by doing so, gradually cut down on the less severe cases through a message to the system that somebody with teeth is watching and it had better play by the rules.
But the best place for this isn’t the TDSB. It’s at the province. And if the McGuinty Liberals really want to make good on their promise to rebuild public confidence in the school system, they’ll install the full set of accountability checks and balances, including an ombudsman.
To see this article, click here
Tags:
|
|
|
Friday, 22 January 2010 20:17 |
|
by Don Peat, Toronto Sun
Toronto District School Board trustee Josh Matlow is trying to get his colleagues to approve a policy about funding trustees’ legal bills.
Matlow — who is running for a city council seat in the 2010 municipal election — said the move is needed now before trustees get themselves into the heaps of trouble Toronto city council now finds itself in.
“Let’s have a policy framework in place before we start making ad hoc decisions,” Matlow said Friday.
The Toronto Party, which wants political parties allowed at the municipal level, launched a lawsuit on Christmas Eve and is suing 23 city councillors who they say broke the law by reimbursing legal expenses two colleagues, Adrian Heaps and Giorgio Mammoliti, incurred as candidates, not councillors, in the last municipal election.
City council will have the chance to consider a motion on Tuesday to reconsider the payout.
Matlow and fellow trustee Chris Tonks want trustees to approve giving board legal staff the green light to write up a policy to govern when the board will cover legal expenses for candidates and when it won’t.
“If there is a clear policy that prohibits paying legal expenses for a trustee, who for example, has either settled or lost a libel suit, and it’s clear in writing, then it can’t happen at the TDSB,” Matlow said.
The two trustees want staff to include advice on how to prohibit covering legal costs incurred by an elected candidate that has been sued for libel or slander and settled or lost the lawsuit.
“We want to ensure that the folly at City Hall does not find it’s way to the TDSB,” Matlow said.
To see this article, click here
Tags:
|
|
Friday, 08 January 2010 08:30 |
'Clear Conflict'
Kenyon Wallace, National Post
Outspoken trustee Josh Matlow is attacking a proposal by Toronto District School Board chief Chris Spence to introduce an ombudsman who reports to the education director, and not the board.
"If the ombudsman is reporting to the very institution that he or she is being asked to oversee and which pays their salary and budget, there's a clear conflict and also, at the very least, it creates an appearance of bias," said Mr. Matlow, who is lobbying the TDSB to instead ask the province to allow school boards to fall under the jurisdiction of the provincial ombudsman, Andre Marin.
Tags:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Thursday, 10 December 2009 09:10 |
Trustee wants provincial watchdog to probe complaints against board
By DON PEAT, TORONTO SUN
An outspoken trustee is calling for Ontario Ombudsman Andre Marin to have oversight over the Toronto District School Board rather than the board policing itself.
Trustee Josh Matlow told the Sun yesterday he wants the province's watchdog to be able to investigate complaints about Canada's largest school board along with every other school board.
Tags:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 11:17 |
School board trustees in Ontario are trying to fend off a move that could hold them accountable for students achieving the provincial standard in reading, writing and math, triggering a broad debate about who in society is responsible for what happens in the classroom.
The McGuinty government is proposing to enshrine into law a role now collectively shared by parents, teachers, school board trustees and society at large. Proposed legislation would make improving student achievement the number one priority for trustees of the province's 72 school boards.
Tags:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 22 April 2009 00:00 |
|
BY JOSH MATLOW Toronto District School Trustee for St. Paul's TORONTO STAR, APRIL 22, 2009 Our city's parents, students and residents have asked the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), the City of Toronto and Queen's Park to find a long-term funding solution for Toronto's school pools. Shamefully, what they have learned through their valiant efforts, turned accidental civics lesson, is that something is terribly wrong with how our municipal and education systems work together.
Tags:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Monday, 08 December 2008 10:54 |
|
Tags:
|
|
Friday, 05 December 2008 15:09 |
FYI- If the government accepts our request, the manner in which the TDSB (and other school boards and municipalities) chooses to conduct debates of public import in private session, how it is managing its safe schools and equity departments, spending money while in deficit, Human rights complaints, etc. will at long last be open for public scrutiny through the office of the Ombudsman.
This motion will be debated at the TDSB in January.
Whereas, The Ombudsman of Ontario is an Officer of the Provincial Legislature who is independent of government and political parties and who’s job it is to ensure government accountability through effective oversight of the administration of government services; and Whereas, The Ombudsman's authority, as established by the Ombudsman Act to oversee the delivery of public services, has not been modernized in over 30 years; and Whereas, five Canadian provinces and territories already allow the Ombudsman of their respective jurisdictions to investigate school boards; and Whereas, the Toronto District School Board is granted a budget of $2.3 billion by the provincial government for public education services; and Whereas, the Ombudsman can investigate complaints about and conduct systemic investigations into services provided by the government of Ontario and its organizations but currently not the “MUSH” (Municipalities, Universities, School boards and Hospitals) sector: and Whereas, allowing the Ombudsman to investigate school boards, along with other members of the “MUSH” sector, will contribute to holding these public institutions accountable to parents, students and all residents who may have a legitimate complaint about their school board, municipality or another public body that is funded by tax dollars collected by the provincial government; Therefore, Be it resolved that the Toronto District School Board formally requests that the provincial government amend the Ontario Ombudsman Act to allow the Ombudsman’s authority to extend to municipalities and school boards, universities, hospitals, long-term care facilities, police, and children’s aid societies to support transparency and accountability for the public purse and to protect the rights of Ontarians.
Josh Matlow Trustee For St. Paul’s Toronto District School Board www.joshmatlow.ca
Tags:
|
|
Friday, 28 November 2008 09:20 |
Kristin Rushowy Education Reporter Toronto school trustees have voted themselves new guidelines that dictate who they can speak to, as well as when to end conversations if confidential matters arise. In what one trustee is calling a violation of Charter rights, the Toronto District School Board decided Wednesday night to ban contact between a trustee and an employee of the board who is up for a promotion, without first clearing it with a school's superintendent. Trustees must now also immediately end any conversation with a person who discloses information that could only have been obtained by a breach of confidentiality. Violators could be hauled before the board's ethics committee, which recently banned Trustee Scott Harrison from a number of private meetings for discussing a personnel matter. The committee cannot fire a trustee. "I understand what they are trying to get to, what I'm concerned about is ... that it's going way over their purview, into people's lives," said Trustee Josh Matlow, an outspoken critic on some board issues. Matlow has written a letter to Education Minister Kathleen Wynne, asking her to "place the board's ethics review process under moratorium until the ministry has concluded its work" defining the roles and responsibilities of elected trustees across the province. Board chair John Campbell called the guidelines mostly procedural, and said trustees can talk to people who are up for a promotion or who have applied for a position – but not about the new job. There's no intention to police conversations, he said. "The intention is to protect the integrity of the process and protect people's privacy." The board's ethics committee was struck about a year ago. Campbell said when dealing with sensitive issues, it is "better to err on the side of caution." Matlow says the ethics committee recently "found a member guilty of `complicity' in wrongdoing even though it explicitly found that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing." To see this story, visit:
Tags:
|
|
Thursday, 27 November 2008 14:45 |
|
Dear Minister Wynne, As you are aware, the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) recently created an Ethics Review Committee to consider and make recommendations to the Board about the role of TDSB trustees, the Code of Ethics for trustees, meeting norms for trustees, procedures to address complaints about a breach of the Code of Ethics and to receive and consider complaints that a trustee has breached the TDSB Code of Ethics. I respectfully submit to you that the TDSB’s ethics review process is fundamentally flawed, as it does not meet reasonable standards of natural justice and due process. Regretfully, my recent efforts to persuade the Board to amend the process have been summarily dismissed and I now write to you to bring this matter to your attention and invite you to intervene. Read more....
Tags:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 08 October 2008 11:20 |
|
A review of various City/ School Board governance models- Trustee Matlow is working on a set of recommendations to reform the TDSB governance.
Tags:
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|